"I m in debian wheezy which is much more recent than ubuntu 10.04"

"I believe ubuntu is smaller debian wheezy smaller still or even alpine for tiny start point"

"As for debian being more stable than ubuntu for using as server it can be true in very rare occasions where the package is very obscure"

"This is because ubuntu 15.10 uses a newer version of libc and libstdc++ which is not available on debian 8"

"Debian 9 stable at the moment uses and older version than ubuntu 18.04 stable at the moment and debian unstable"

"In ubuntu it is a bit easier to install packages for java development but it doesn t really matter that much;remember that ubuntu is based on debian so it works the same"

"Recompiling ubuntu kernels is harder -- recompiling ubuntu kernels will require working with debian build tools"

"And people do install on people ubuntu system some external libraries so you need to search a lot more than what ubuntu contains and i won t be surprised if ubuntu or debian are large enough to already have conflicting libraries"

"A debian or ubuntu system contains more python packages but the apt-get packages are specifically tuned for your system"

This also might be fixed solved in the git add mechanism in more up to date versioning i vaguely remember tracks files in directories adding tracks files in directories own .gitignore files to empty directories so i d really recommend trying to upgrade to the highest git versioning you can for that and other benefites your distro may provide by default an older versioning as ubuntu and debian do

Some deductions on the matter i understand that ubuntu is based on unstable debian so stable debian is better for production

Note the below test results are on debian;testing on ubuntu wsl is indeed much worse

Ubuntu heavily relies on python scripting and generally consumes more resources than debian

Reference from here link for ntp commands as i am more familiar with ubuntu debian based commands

Emember that ubuntu is based on debian so it works the same;ubuntu just adds more user-friendly gui s

Debian 9.3 is current but that probably matters much less than debian being tested less than ubuntu

Ubuntu is far less conservative than debian so you will get closer to the bleeding edge

Can anyone help me to clear my doubts - why debian os takes less time for context switching although ubuntu is based on debian kernel

The main advantage of the debian image is the smaller size â it clocks in at around 85.1 mb compared to around 200 mb for ubuntu

I have to create a temp table at some point in order to present the data and what is really strange is that on the ubuntu system it takes 400 ms response from browser and on the debian it takes more than 10 seconds

This is quite common with debian based systems whereas most ubuntu has one running at all times

Since ubuntu 10.10 is newer than debian squeeze if you can do it on squeeze you can certainly do it on ubuntu

The packages provided by ubuntu debian do not automatically install all dependencies required for every module so i had to hunt down a solution between stackexchange google and the developers website;what fixed this for me note on debian not centos was installing the following packages

Unfortunately this ends up causing you a problem because ubuntu adopted all these packages from debian but doesn t support them in the same way as debian does and debian packagers seem to feel put upon to be asked to support these ubuntu users;so ubuntu user goes to main exim list and is told to ask their packager for help

Ubuntu has nicer frontend and could be more suitable for windows emigrants while debian is more for backend guys

Is it because a compiled python code under debian is not compatible with ubuntu or am i doing a personal mistake like missing library etc.

For instance in a debian 6 system i see the mcomplexprogramtarget macro used only in the motif.rules file which in turn is included from cde.rules and that is not included by any of the platform-specific imake files;since it is unlikely that op has motif installed on ubuntu it seems more likely that this was cut paste from some example which was originally written for motif for solaris back in the 1990s when cde was supported